Don't be so dismissive

It is a bit derogatory to state this debate was nothing more than an exercise in PR. To what end? We are a non-profit run by volunteers who put many hours into helping people learn more about open source. Obviously there is a PR aspect to this event as any event that you don't want to sit by yourself. The event served its purpose and the video is a great reference for some of the important things an organization should consider when reviewing licenses.

I hear a lot of belly aching and personal attacks from from a tiny but vocal minority. Frankly I am not impressed. I haven't heard anything criticizing the positions themselves or the judges positions. Thus I challenge you to share with us any particular aspect of what the speakers said that was incorrect, invalid, incomplete, or where you can make a meaningful contribution to the discussion.